Subpoena of Princess Cristina on Urdangarin case suspended

The judge handling the investigation into the business affairs of royal son-in-law I?aki Urdangarin on Friday accepted a petition by the prosecutor¡¯s office to suspend the subpoena of Urdangarin¡¯s wife Princess Cristina to answer questions on the case in court.

Prosecutor Pedro Horrach argued that the justice system should first rule on an appeal by the prosecutor¡¯s office against the implication of the infanta.

Earlier this week, Judge Jos¨¦ Castro summonsed Prince Cristina to appear before him on April 27 to clarify her role as a director of the non-profit N¨®os Institute, through which her husband Urdangarin allegedly siphoned off millions in public funds to private firms, including Aizoon, which is jointly owned by the princess and her husband.

In his judgment, Horrach argued that it was ¡°discriminatory¡± to cite the infanta as a suspect on the case based on the evidence that had been gathered in the course of the investigation to date. He said ¡°absolutely nothing¡± had emerged in the probe to reverse the previous decision not to name her as a suspect in the case.

In order to justify calling off the citation of Princess Cristina, Horrach referred to testimony by Urdangarin¡¯s former partner at N¨®os, Diego Torres, on the infanta¡¯s role in the organization. Torres cited things such as her accompanying him and Urdangarin to view a property the N¨®os Institute was considering moving its headquarters to.

Horrach said Torres¡¯ testimony had ¡°zero criminal relevance.¡± The judge also argued that it had not been demonstrated that the personal secretary to the royal daughters, Carlos Garc¨ªa Revenga, who also worked for the N¨®os Institute, knew that Urdangarin was receiving ¡°privileged treatment¡± from public administrations.

Torres has been gradually feeding the judge investigating case with emails that include exchanges between the royal couple on N¨®os¡¯ business.