Doctor in Spain¡¯s first ¡°stolen baby¡± case committed offenses, but won¡¯t be convicted

The Madrid High Court today announced that it had found the retired Spanish doctor Eduardo Vela, 85, to be the perpetrator of the three crimes of which he had been accused in Spain¡¯s first ¡°stolen baby¡± trial: child abduction, faking a birth, and falsifying childbirth records and other official documents relating to a woman named In¨¦s Madrigal.

Vela was facing 11 years in jail for the three offenses, with the public prosecutor also calling for compensation of €150,000

However, he will not serve a prison term for the crimes because the court ruled that the offenses passed the statute of limitations when Madrigal turned 28: 10 years after she became of legal age, because that is the statute of limitations on the most serious of the three crimes, abduction. There is, however, a division of opinion among jurists on whether this period should have been counted from the day she turned 18, or from the day she realized that she could be a stolen baby and filed a complaint, in 2012. Madrigal is now 49 years old.

Vela was facing 11 years in jail for the three offenses, with the public prosecutor also calling for compensation of €150,000 to be paid to Madrigal. The sentence backs her claim that she was stolen from her real parents in 1969 and given to another family. Madrigal had asked for 13 years in jail for the former doctor and no compensation. ¡°I¡¯m not interested in the money or for Vela to go to jail,¡± she said after the last session of the trial. ¡°I want this to help get other closed cases reopened.¡±

In recent years it has emerged that during the dictatorship of Francisco Franco, a network of nuns and doctors at certain hospitals had taken babies from poor families or single mothers and given them to wealthy parents unable to conceive.

In today¡¯s ruling, the judges found that it has been ¡°proved beyond a doubt¡± that Dr Vela ¨C who at the time of Madrigal¡¯s birth was working as a gynecologist and medical director at a Madrid hospital ¨C handed her over to a married couple, In¨¦s P¨¦rez P¨¦rez and Pablo Madrigal Revilla.

Vela was shown to have faked ¡°a birth that did not take place,¡± establishing a ¡°bogus parentage,¡± without ¡°any proof that he had previously sought consent from, nor informed, the parents of the newborn baby.¡±

Vela was proven to have faked ¡°a birth that did not take place,¡± establishing a ¡°bogus parentage¡±

According to the ruling, Vela was responsible for the ¡°bogus certification of the supposed childbirth of In¨¦s P¨¦rez P¨¦rez, knowing that it had not taken place.¡±

Around 1,500 cases of suspected stolen babies have been reported in Spain as part of a scheme that is thought to have spanned decades. Most have been shelved due to the time that has elapsed since then.

Vela used to work at a Madrid clinic called San Ram¨®n, which is at the center of the scandal. His top aide was a nun named Mar¨ªa G¨®mez Valbuena, who died four days after being summoned to testify in court.

The former head of the San Ram¨®n clinic had tried to delay his court date for as long as possible, alleging health issues. But a forensic expert sent to examine him declared Vela fit to stand trial.

Madrigal said in court that she began researching her own origins after reading an article in EL PA?S about stolen babies at San Ram¨®n clinic. She had known since the age of 18 that she was adopted, but she believed that her biological mother had given her up for adoption because she lacked the means to take care of her.

The former head of the San Ram¨®n clinic had tried to delay his court date for as long as possible, alleging health issues

Her adoptive mother, In¨¦s P¨¦rez, was told that the baby had been born to a woman who had an extra-marital affair while her husband was away. P¨¦rez herself had been married for 19 years, but the couple had been unable to produce any children.

Madrigal¡¯s is the first case to reach the courts. She provided DNA evidence that In¨¦s P¨¦rez is not her biological mother, and a birth certificate signed by Vela stating that she is. Then she filed a complaint against her adoptive mother to help the court case along.

¡°I told her, ¡®I¡¯m going to have to report you, mom.¡¯ She understood that it was the best way to help me, and we agreed that if she ever changed her mind, I would drop the complaint,¡± says Madrigal.

In¨¦s P¨¦rez passed away in December 2016, at age 93. ¡°She never believed that women had been lied to, or that babies were stolen, but she wanted to help me find my origins. She was told that the biological mother was a married woman who¡¯d had an affair.¡±

Speaking earlier this year, Madrigal admitted that while she would like to see Vela convicted, she has no particular desire to see him behind bars. ¡°What I would like is for him to tell the truth, so that those mothers can tell their children, ¡®I did not abandon you¡¯ and for those children to know that they were not abandoned.¡±

English version by Simon Hunter.