La gran filtraci¨®n
Cable sobre el retraso en la licitaci¨®n de las obras del Canal de Panam¨¢
La Embajada en Panam¨¢ analiza las posibles estrategias de los diferentes participantes en la licitaci¨®n con ayuda del asesor independiente
| ID: | 175216 |
| Date: | 2008-10-24 23:37:00 |
| Origin: | 08PANAMA820 |
| Source: | Embassy Panama |
| Classification: | CONFIDENTIAL |
| Dunno: | 07PANAMA1899 08PANAMA320 08PANAMA732 |
| Destination: | VZCZCXYZ0004 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHZP #0820/01 2982337 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 242337Z OCT 08 FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2603 INFO RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC PRIORITY RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY RUEKJCS/OSD WASHDC PRIORITY |
C O N F I D E N T I A L PANAMA 000820 SIPDIS DEPT OF COMMERCE - MATTHEW GAISFORD DEPT OF TREASURY - SARA SENICH E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/22/2018 TAGS: ECON, EINV, ETRD, MARR, PM, EWWT SUBJECT: CANAL BIDDING PROCESS DELAYED AGAIN REF: A. 2007 PANAMA 1899 B. 2008 PANAMA 0320 C. 2008 PANAMA 0732 Classified By: Ambassador Stephenson for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 1. (U) This cable contains sensitive proprietary business information concerning on-going negotiations. Please handle accordingly. ------- Summary ------- 2. (C) The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) announced on October 24 that the deadline for submission of bids on the contract for the third set of locks, centerpiece of the overall $5.25 billion Panama Canal expansion, will be extended from December 10, 2008 to March 3, 2009. This third delay marks turbulence in the bidding process for this mega-project and allows the ACP to reconsider the key issue of the balance of risk between the ACP and the consortia. Furthermore, the bidding consortia claim that the net effect of the Panama Canal Authority's (ACP) 18 amendments to the original request for proposal added complexity to an already complex project. Despite the bidding complications, there is no indication of a decrease in the level of transparency and fairness in the process. While the Panama Canal Authority (ACP) enjoys a record of efficiently, safely, and profitably operating the canal and overseeing incremental improvements, constructing a project of this scope and complexity demands a different skill set and effective ACP cooperation with its project management advisor. Regarding funding for the expansion, the Government of Panama trumpeted its success in securing a $2.3 billion financing package despite construction cost estimates that exceed original projections. ------------------------- Expanding a Canal is Hard ------------------------- 3. (C) Jhan Schmitz of the American firm CH2MHill, the Project Management Advisor to the ACP, stated on September 8, "Nobody has done this (the Canal Expansion Project) before, but all the pieces have been done before." He noted that the coordination of all the contractors and the scale of the $3.35 billion project combined with the seven year construction timeline will be challenging. Although rolling gates have been constructed before, the scale is unprecedented. The design calls for 4,000 ton, 50 foot thick, 60 foot high rolling gates with a lifespan of 100 years that must move across 200 feet of water in ten minutes or less. The complexity of the expansion combined with the fact that the ACP has never managed a multi-billion dollar project has created delays in the bidding process due to numerous amendments. While the ACP does not have experience in mega-projects, the Panamanian people and world-wide maritime transport industry recognize that the ACP transparently and successfully operates the Canal and implements incremental infrastructure improvements to the Canal - see ref C. -------------- Issues of Risk -------------- 4. (C) The ACP will likely institute changes to its "draconian" "liquidated damages" clause, according to President of Bechtel Civil, Michael Adams on October 5. This view was confirmed in an October 20 conversation between Administrator Aleman and the Ambassador when the Minister stated the ACP will review the full status of the bidding process to encourage participation of all consortia and to examine flexibility on the bidding deadline, the budget, and issues of risk. For the third set of locks contract, the original bidding documents placed every possible risk (financial and technical) onto the consortia. Subsequent amendments shifted some of the risk burden from the consortia to the ACP, such as price escalation clauses for some construction commodities. However, the possible deal killer for the bidders remains liquidated damages - a specified amount of damages by a contractor for non-performance. For example, the rolling gates must close in 10 minutes. The liquidated damages clause, if enforced, would cost the winning consortium hundreds of millions of dollars if the gates close a just few seconds over 10 minutes. Usually, liquidated damages clauses apportion damages according to the severity of non-performance. There is no incentive if the gate is faster than the requirement. Adams stated the ACP is creating an adversarial relationship and is fostering the conditions for future litigation. ----------------------------------------- ACP Appears to Listen to Advisor's Advice ----------------------------------------- 5. (C) The ACP and its project management advisor (CH2MHill) are struggling over the control of the contracting process. The fierce independence and control of details that have made the ACP an effective manager of the Canal are impeding the management of the bidding process, according to CH2MHill, which cautions that the project cannot continue to a successful completion on its current course. It appears that the ACP is listening. 6. (C) In its most recent round of talks on October 9, CH2MHill representatives Joe Cazares, Canal Construction Advisor, and Michael Kennedy, President of Transportation Business Group report that CH2MHill issued an "early warning notice" as specified in the contract between CH2MHill. In order to correct the process, CH2MHill outlined options for CH2MHill to gain control of the contracting process. Kennedy told the Ambassador on October 16 that CH2MHill would not walk away from the project, because that is "not who we are." -------------------------------------------- Bidding Process - 18 Amendments and Counting -------------------------------------------- 7. (C) The original specifications for the contract for the third set of locks, the primary contract of the expansion, were publicly released on December 21, 2007. To date, the ACP amended the document 18 times, which is higher than the normal two or three modifications for a project of this complexity, according to Schmitz. The amendments resulted from the ACP and the four prequalified consortia refining the original specifications. On the one hand, ACP Administrator Aleman asserts the refining process provides "value engineering" - cooperatively designing plans with bidders (which shifts extra costs to the bidders). ACP Administrator Aleman in several meetings has stated that the process will reduce the likelihood of future litigation, improve the design, and achieve the best price for the ACP. While meeting with Aleman on August 27, a delegation of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) personnel lauded the ACP's value engineering process as having the potential to be a model for extremely large USACE projects in which there are only a few bidders in order to reduce the likelihood of legal disputes. On the other hand, the ACP's failure to incorporate "tracked changes" in over a thousand pages of specifications in each of the 18 amendments has created confusion, uncertainty, and deadline delays (from August 22 to October 8 to December 10 and now to March 3). Due to the delay, all four consortia are spending a million dollars per month, according to Bechtel (one of the four prequalified consortia - see ref B for information on the four prequalified consortia) and CH2MHill Representatives. ------------------------------------------ Bidders' Dilemma - Lowball, Value, or Punt ------------------------------------------ 8. (C) Adams of Bechtel outlined three possible bidding strategies for Bechtel and the other consortia for the locks contact which the ACP publicly expects to be $3.35 billion or less: bid lowball, bid value, or punt. -- Lowball Bid: Bechtel assumes that governments (the ACP is quasi-statal) are only able to accept the lowest bid due to political reasons; therefore, Bechtel must be the lowest bidder in order to win, regardless of their technical design. Bechtel anticipates that the "lowball strategy," which would entail bidding low enough to win this highly prestigious contract yet not high enough to cover contingencies (much less profits) could lead to crippling losses. However, Adams believes that the two weakest consortia, Sacyr led Spanish consortium (which is reportedly close to bankruptcy) and the French-led consortium, might lowball the bid with the intention of securing the contract and attempt to renegotiate the price during construction. Bechtel has been worried about this concern since April - see ref B. -- Value Bid: Bechtel bids what they believe is the proper cost of the contract to construct the third set of locks which is in the $4-8 billion range depending on which Bechtel official provides the number. Adams noted that traditionally Bechtel's services are more expensive than its competitors, but that Bechtel finishes all of their projects and has high quality engineering. -- Punt: Bechtel decides that bidding on the locks contract creates too much risk for the company and bids $10 billion dollars. By putting in such a high bid, Bechtel would not expect to win the contract, but exchange ownership of Bechtel's engineering plans for a several million dollar stipend from the ACP and the right to walk away without any legal obligations. --------- Financing --------- 9. (C) President Torrijos secured $2.3 billion in financing for the already initiated $5.25 billion overall Canal expansion (construction of the locks and related dredging and excavation projects); the ACP plans to fund the remaining cost out of its operating budget. During a October 14 press conference, Torrijos announced that five governmental financial institutions offered loans with a 20 year term with a 10-year grace period and an average annual interest rate of 5.49%. The lenders and amounts committed are: Japan Bank for International Cooperation, $800 million; European Investment Bank, $500 million; Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), $400 million; Andean Development Corporation, $300 million; and International Finance Corporations, $300 million. Minister of Canal Affairs Dani Kuzniecky was pleased that the cost of financing fell below ACP projections and that these lenders remained committed to the ACP despite the on-going financial crisis. We understand that First Vice-President and Foreign Minister Samuel Lewis Navarro told EEB A/S Sullivan that President Torrijos wants to announce the consolidation of financing for the Canal expansion at the December 9-10 Pathways to Prosperity Ministerial. ----- Price ----- 10. (C) The $5.25 billion cost estimate for the Canal expansion was established by the ACP in 2005 when commodity prices, financial environment, and world economy were more favorable than they are at present. An IDB independent consultant estimated the total cost to be $5.9 billion and Bechtel representatives believe the price could be $5.9 to $9.9 billion dollars if all risk in the locks contract is placed upon the consortia. The IDB analysis of alternative scenarios for the IDB Loan Proposal states that under the worst case scenarios the ACP has a strong capacity to repay the outstanding debt due to its strong balance sheet. ------- Comment ------- 11. (C) Post believes the bidding extension provides time for the ACP, the Project Management Advisor CH2MHill, and the consortia to iron out the fundamental issues outlined above. The Panamanians realized that a project of this scope, complexity, and duration requires flexibility, even if that flexibility entails finishing the expansion beyond the summer 2014 deadline. It is noteworthy to mention that the announcement of the winner now likely will occur after the May 3 elections. STEPHENSON |
Traduce este documento ?
Traducci¨®n autom¨¢tica. Puede que el texto traducido no sea fiel al original
Tu suscripci¨®n se est¨¢ usando en otro dispositivo
?Quieres a?adir otro usuario a tu suscripci¨®n?
Si contin¨²as leyendo en este dispositivo, no se podr¨¢ leer en el otro.
FlechaTu suscripci¨®n se est¨¢ usando en otro dispositivo y solo puedes acceder a EL PA?S desde un dispositivo a la vez.
Si quieres compartir tu cuenta, cambia tu suscripci¨®n a la modalidad Premium, as¨ª podr¨¢s a?adir otro usuario. Cada uno acceder¨¢ con su propia cuenta de email, lo que os permitir¨¢ personalizar vuestra experiencia en EL PA?S.
En el caso de no saber qui¨¦n est¨¢ usando tu cuenta, te recomendamos cambiar tu contrase?a aqu¨ª.
Si decides continuar compartiendo tu cuenta, este mensaje se mostrar¨¢ en tu dispositivo y en el de la otra persona que est¨¢ usando tu cuenta de forma indefinida, afectando a tu experiencia de lectura. Puedes consultar aqu¨ª los t¨¦rminos y condiciones de la suscripci¨®n digital.
