Guant¨¢namo
Cable sobre c¨®mo convencer a Espa?a para que acoja presos de Guant¨¢namo
El Departamento de Estado de EE UU sugiere que se aproveche la posible preocupaci¨®n de Espa?a por quedar detr¨¢s de otros pa¨ªses que se han comprometido con EE UU sobre Guant¨¢namo.
| ID: | 200357 |
| Date: | 2009-04-02 13:02:00 |
| Origin: | 09MADRID351 |
| Source: | Embassy Madrid |
| Classification: | SECRET//NOFORN |
| Dunno: | 06MADRID2657 09SECSTATE31088 09STATE20757 |
| Destination: | VZCZCXRO7633 PP RUEHBC RUEHDBU RUEHDE RUEHDH RUEHFL RUEHKUK RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHLH RUEHNP RUEHPW RUEHROV RUEHTRO DE RUEHMD #0351/01 0921302 ZNY SSSSS ZZH P 021302Z APR 09 FM AMEMBASSY MADRID TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0472 INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUCNISL/ISLAMIC COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHLA/AMCONSUL BARCELONA PRIORITY 3932 RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 0894 RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY |
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 MADRID 000351 NOFORN SIPDIS FOR EUR/WE, NEA, S/WCI, INR PASS TO NSC FOR RASMUSSEN, BRADLEY E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/20/2034 TAGS: PREL, PGOV, PTER, PHUM, MOPS, KAWK, KISL, KPAO, SP SUBJECT: SPAIN: S/WCI ENGAGES GOS ON ACCEPTING GTMO DETAINEES REF: A. STATE 20757 B. SECSTATE 31088 C. 06 MADRID 2657 MADRID 00000351 001.2 OF 003 Classified By: ADCM William H. Duncan for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d) 1. (S//NF) SUMMARY: As part of a 10-nation visit through the Middle East and Europe, S/WCI Ambassador-at-Large Clint Williamson on March 23 met an inter-ministerial group of Spanish officials for discussions on the status of Guantanamo Bay (GTMO) detainees and the prospect of the GOS accepting some of them for resettlement. The meeting was the first in-depth bilateral discussion on the issue and took place after Secretary Clinton's February 24 meeting in Washington with Foreign Minister Miguel Angel Moratinos (See REFTEL A), in which he confirmed GOS openness to accepting GTMO detainees. END SUMMARY. 2. (C//NF) The GOS delegation was led by four Directors General (DGs) - Assistant Secretary equivalent - from three ministries: Luis Felipe Fernandez de la Pena, MFA DG for non-EU Europe and North America; Miguel Angel de Frutos, MFA DG for Consular Affairs and Assistance; Arturo Avello, the Ministry of Interior's DG for International Relations and Immigration; and Aurora Mejia, the Ministry of Justice's DG for International Judicial Cooperation. Fernandez de la Pena will accompany Deputy Foreign Minister Angel Lossada to Washington April 6-7. //Efforts to Close Guantanamo and the Possible Role of the GOS// 3. (S//F) Ambassador Williamson noted the high priority placed by the new Administration on closing Guantanamo within one year, and explained the January 22 Executive Order signed by President Obama on his second day in office. The order called for a DOJ-led review process, currently underway, to reevaluate all 241 GTMO detainees. Each individual will be categorized as cleared for transfer, cleared for release, or able to be prosecuted. Of those cleared for transfer or release, an estimated 50-60, from countries such as China, Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Syria and Uzbekistan, will not be transferred home due to humane treatment concerns. It is detainees from within this group, representing the lowest threat level, that the USG hopes to resettle in Europe. Williamson noted that this was critical if the USG was to be successful in closing GTMO, in that it would need the help of friends and allies who would be willing to accept some of the detainees. He added that the GOS would be able to review files on any detainees it considers for resettlement, and could also visit Guantanamo to conduct interviews. In response to a question from Avello, Williamson said that the USG will not provide legal documents for detainees, allowing countries to confer status (i.e., citizenship, asylum, legal residency with work permit) as they deem appropriate under their own laws. 4. (S//NF) The Ambassador also detailed security concerns regarding the 99 Yemeni detainees in custody whom the USG hoped to transfer to Saudi Arabia's rehabilitation program. GOS officials agreed that Sanaa is not in a position to guarantee security, but did not suggest a possible role for Spain in solving the Yemen issue. 5. (S//NF) Fernandez de la Pena stated that the GOS welcomed USG efforts to close the GTMO detention facility, which the GOS views as a "black hole" contrary to international law, and looked forward to responses to the questions posed by the recent EU delegation to Washington (REFTEL B). The Ambassador indicated that these were being addressed by a US interagency group and that written responses would soon be forwarded to Brussels. At the urging of the GOS representatives, Williamson provided generalized oral responses to the most pertinent questions affecting GOS decision-making, but noted again that definitive answers would be forthcoming. Fernandez de la Pena said the GOS "position of principle" is to take a "positive, constructive approach to the issue." However, he cited a number of legal and security-related concerns. The Spanish Supreme Court in 2006 overturned a six-year sentence by Spain's National Court MADRID 00000351 002.2 OF 003 against former GTMO detainee Hamed Abderrahaman Ahmed, claiming that evidence collected during his interrogation at GTMO was inadmissible. The ruling later became a precedent which prevented another former detainee, Lahcen Ikassrien, from being prosecuted in Spanish courts (REFTEL C). Citing reports from GOS security services, Fernandez de la Pena said, these same individuals are "not resting quietly at home." In addition, he expressed concern that civil lawsuits and criminal investigations could be initiated pursuant to the country's universal jurisdiction laws. The free movement afforded by the Schengen Zone also posed a problem. Fernandez de la Pena noted that the mitigating domestic security risks would be less challenging given the robust intelligence capacity developed by Spain over 40 years combating Basque terrorism and, more recently, radical Islamic terrorism. This same experience though, makes the GOS very cautious about incurring the extra security risks inherent in accepting GTMO detainees for resettlement. 6. (S//NF) Williamson acknowledged GOS security concerns, but noted that the group of detainees now being discussed were at a lower threat level. The USG was not requesting that countries detain or prosecute these detainees, nor were we suggesting the imposition of robust security measures. It would be up to each country to take whatever steps, if any, it felt necessary to mitigate risks. With respect to Schengen concerns, the Ambassador highlighted that both EU officials and lawyers for the detainees agreed that voluntary restrictions could be used to limit movement of transferees to within the Schengen country accepting them, and he noted that the EU was looking at other measures to assuage concerns about unfettered movement. //Timeframe and U.S. Detainee Acceptance// 7. (S//NF) Regarding timeframe, Williamson indicated that the USG hoped an EU framework facilitating member state acceptance of detainees would be completed during the Czech Presidency of the EU. On U.S. acceptance of detainees, Williamson said it was one of many policy decisions under consideration. He elaborated that the USG will end up taking the most dangerous detainees and would likely bear responsibility for them for years to come, since many in this group would ultimately be prosecuted and imprisoned. Friends and allies were being approached to resettle those who pose less of a threat. Positive signals had been received from France, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, Portugal, Switzerland, Belgium and Italy. Upon hearing that USG negotiations with some of these European countries were much further advanced, Fernandez de la Pena seemed slightly concerned that Spain was behind the curve in engaging the USG on negotiations on this issue. //Home Countries' Responses to Detainees' Resettlement Elsewhere// 8. (S//NF) Fernandez de la Pena inquired whether any countries of origin had protested their citizens being resettled elsewhere. Williamson acknowledged this was an issue with the Chinese Uighers. At the same time, Beijing did not downgrade relations nor recall its Ambassador when Albania took 5 Uigher detainees and there were no serious trade ramifications. Nevertheless, Williamson pointed out that the USG could not predict future reactions. Fernandez de la Pena voiced concern that by taking another country's nationals the GOS was implicitly calling the home country a human rights violator, which could have diplomatic ramifications. The Ambassador said that so far this had not been the case, and he pointed out that most of the countries involved had raised no objections to their nationals being re-settled elsewhere. //Comment// 9. (S//NF) The Embassy was pleased to see that that the MFA arranged an interagency discussion on the detainee issue. While Foreign Minister Moratinos has publicly voiced GOS support for accepting GTMO detainees, the issue is far from unanimous in Spain. Several opposition parties in parliament - where Zapatero's Socialists have an increasingly fragile MADRID 00000351 003.2 OF 003 minority government - have expressed concerns about how a prospective resettlement might take place, while there are also judicial questions about how this might occur within Spanish law and reservations by some on security implications for Spain. Nevertheless, the GOS representatives expressed appreciation for the explanations provided by Ambassador Williamson and indicated that these were extremely helpful for GOS decision-making. Going forward, it may be possible to take advantage of possible GOS concerns that it is at the rear of the pack in terms of EU countries engaging with the U.S. on detainee issues. 10. (SBU) Ambassador Williamson did not discuss ways in which Spain could support development of an EU framework, but will soon meet with the Spanish Ambassador to Washington to follow-up. 11. (U) This cable was cleared by Ambassador Williamson. CHACON |
Traduce este documento ?
Traducci¨®n autom¨¢tica. Puede que el texto traducido no sea fiel al original
Tu suscripci¨®n se est¨¢ usando en otro dispositivo
?Quieres a?adir otro usuario a tu suscripci¨®n?
Si contin¨²as leyendo en este dispositivo, no se podr¨¢ leer en el otro.
FlechaTu suscripci¨®n se est¨¢ usando en otro dispositivo y solo puedes acceder a EL PA?S desde un dispositivo a la vez.
Si quieres compartir tu cuenta, cambia tu suscripci¨®n a la modalidad Premium, as¨ª podr¨¢s a?adir otro usuario. Cada uno acceder¨¢ con su propia cuenta de email, lo que os permitir¨¢ personalizar vuestra experiencia en EL PA?S.
En el caso de no saber qui¨¦n est¨¢ usando tu cuenta, te recomendamos cambiar tu contrase?a aqu¨ª.
Si decides continuar compartiendo tu cuenta, este mensaje se mostrar¨¢ en tu dispositivo y en el de la otra persona que est¨¢ usando tu cuenta de forma indefinida, afectando a tu experiencia de lectura. Puedes consultar aqu¨ª los t¨¦rminos y condiciones de la suscripci¨®n digital.
